One of the more perplexing issues is found in trying to compare the true meanings in a candidates make up when looking at a Congressman or Senator versus the Executive position of a Governor.
The Governor comes up with ideas and presents them, such as his budget etc. Executive is much different and is in many situations at the mercy of the legislative branch.
People seem to pay a whole lot less attention to the veto's that a Governor makes, than in the end result of what happens. They place everything at the feet of the Governor as if everything is his choice, his baby; and that simply is not true. Due process means eventually he is required to sign a bill after his veto's have become extended. Just like in a gun, it carries only so many shells.
Did he have vetoes regarding the bill? A veto is not an end all. It doesn't ensure success against bad ideas and laws.Its not unusual to have a bill that has some good things and some bad things. It is very common. Another thing to consider is what type of legislature is it? Is it liberal dominated? Is it GOP friendly? That has everything to do with what happens. A liberal super majority can pretty much pass through what they want to and a Governor is hamstrung as to what he can do once his vetoes have been exhausted.
Right now we have someone that had zero executive experience and was as jr Senator; and the horrible results show what inexperience will do. Of course, his use of failed Marxist policies do not help either. Do some real research. That doesn't include your favorite talk show hosts or websites. Take a look at the situations people are in and what they actually did. You will find in a lot of cases, people lamely labeled Rino's are not that at all. Intellectual honesty versus agenda driven spam. It makes all the difference in the world.
THINK FOR YOURSELF